Big consulting firm
Hourly billing rewards slow
Revenue is people × weeks × rate. A six-month roadmap bills more than a six-week one, and a pilot that needs a phase two bills again.
Meanwhile, in a vendor demo near you…
A consulting firm bills by the hour, so slow is profitable. A vendor sells seats, so the answer is always its product. Here's who does the work on each team, and when each one is the right call (including when it isn't us).
A big consulting firm sends junior associates and hands you a strategy deck. A vendor sends sales engineers and hands you its product. The League puts one senior operator inside your team to get automations into production. The rest follows from how each one gets paid.
| Big consulting firm | AI vendor | The League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who does the work | Junior associates | Sales engineers | A senior operator, inside your team |
| What you get | A strategy deck | Their product | Automations in production |
| How they get paid | Hours | Seats | A fixed 90-day engagement |
| Which AI tools | Their partners' | Their own | Whatever works best this month |
| Who owns what gets built | Whatever the contract says | They do. You rent it. | You do |
| What comes next | A new statement of work | The renewal | Extend, hire the operator full-time, or take it from here |
The payment model decides what a firm gets rewarded for, and the work drifts toward the reward. Nobody has to lie for that to happen. Warren Buffett, in his 2014 letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders: "Don't ask the barber whether you need a haircut."
Big consulting firm
Revenue is people × weeks × rate. A six-month roadmap bills more than a six-week one, and a pilot that needs a phase two bills again.
AI vendor
Revenue is seats × months. The sales engineer can't tell you to buy a competitor's tool, or nothing at all. So every problem gets shaped to fit the product.
The League
Taking longer doesn't earn us more hours to bill. On day 91 you choose: extend, hire the operator full-time, or take it from here. Nobody extends an operator who didn't ship.
Our incentive isn't neutral either. We want you to extend or hire on day 91. The only road there runs through automations already in production, which is what you wanted anyway.
A big firm is the right call when the job is much bigger than AI, or when the report itself is the deliverable.
In those cases you're paying for a lot of hands, and hours are a fair way to count hands.
Buy straight from the vendor when you already know the problem and a product already solves it. Then anyone standing between you and the vendor is a tax.
The hard part is knowing the problem. If you're not sure which tool fits, or which contract to avoid, our model and vendor selection work answers that before you sign.
The League is the right call when you know AI should be doing part of the work, but nobody can say which part. That's the gap where AI pilots stall: your leadership knows where the hours go but has no time to learn AI, and the people who know AI don't know where your hours go.
Already know the one automation you need? Skip the 90 days. A build sprint ships one automation, start to finish.
Buy from the vendor when you already know the problem and its product solves it. Get outside help when you don't yet know where AI pays back, because a vendor will answer that with its own product.
Yes, for getting AI automations into production: one senior operator ships from inside your leadership team instead of associates producing a strategy deck. For a company-wide reorganization, or an assessment that needs a big-firm signature, a big firm still fits better.
Hourly billing pays more when the work takes longer. We're paid for a fixed 90 days, so the only way to look good is to ship by day 90.
Whatever works best for your problem this month. We don't sell software seats, so there's no seat count pushing the choice.
Take a shorter route: an AI roadmap ranked by return, or model and vendor selection before you sign. Not every question needs a placement.
90-Day Placement
One senior AI operator joins your leadership team for 90 days to find, prove, and ship AI automations on your real data. Built for US companies.
Read itWhy AI pilots stall
Alexander Torrenegra on why most AI pilots never reach production, what 1920s factory electrification teaches leaders, and how to fix it.
Read itAI Consulting
AI consulting for US companies: an AI roadmap ranked by return, model and vendor selection, and build sprints where a senior team ships one automation.
Read itAnswer the call
We'll tell you whether it needs a placement, a build sprint, or just the vendor you already pay.
Schedule a call